This is the current version of this document. To view historic versions of this document click the link in the main navigation (grey) bar above or contact firstname.lastname@example.org for versions that expired pre 27 July 2015.
Section 1 - Overview
(1) The University of New England is committed to maintaining its strong research culture, underpinned by high research training standards. The Confirmation of Candidature procedures provide the rigorous processes that are essential for the maintenance of academic quality and integrity in the University's operations, and that reflect the University's values of providing a formative, respectful, inclusive, flexible and innovative environment for the delivery of high-quality research training for its students.
Section 2 - Scope
(2) These procedures apply to all Higher Degree by Research (HDR) students who are required by their respective degree rules to complete a confirmation of candidature process. These procedures follow rules set out within the UNE higher degree by research course rules
Section 3 - Procedures
(3) These procedures provide for the completion of the probationary phase of a higher degree by research student's candidature.
(4) This confirmation of candidature process assesses formally whether or not a student's candidature can be confirmed.
(5) Accordingly, these procedures form part of the University's quality assurance processes.
(6) The specific aims of these procedures are:
- To identify early in a student's candidature any support, intervention and/or guidance necessary for their proceeding successfully to the next major stage of research;
- To assess a student's progress and the student's academic preparedness to complete the degree;
- To provide the student with an opportunity to demonstrate academic skills appropriate to higher degree by research;
- To ensure that the scope, size, structure and complexity of the research program is appropriate to the level of the higher degree by research; and
- To help ensure timely and successful degree completion.
(7) Principal Supervisors are responsible for providing HDR students with an induction early (typically not later than one month after commencement) regarding confirmation of candidature procedures, and the criteria for successful completion of the confirmation process. As a minimum, this induction must include:
- The sources of support and guidance and their location;
- The timeframe when the confirmation process will be held (ideally with an estimated date);
- The composition of the Confirmation Panel (by role, not necessarily by name);
- How the Panel will conduct the process;
- The criteria that are required to successfully complete confirmation;
- The importance of confirmation as a major milestone in candidature; and
- The consequences of not passing confirmation.
(8) The Principal Supervisor will provide a record of the induction, including the Research Degree Supervision Agreement to the HDR student and the Panel.
(9) Confirmation of candidature will usually be completed six (6) months, and not later than twelve (12) months after start of candidature.
Criteria for Passing Confirmation
These criteria may be adopted by Schools to an individual student's circumstances and to those of the research program. All adaptions must be included in the supervisor agreement:
- Submission of an acceptable research proposal for formal approval before the Confirmation process;
- Submission of an annotated bibliography or literature review if not already included in the research proposal;
- Where appropriate, submission of an acceptable research design;
- Where appropriate, application, or received consent (as appropriate and set down in the supervisor agreement) of ethics approval for the research methodology;
- Successful completion of any prescribed safety or training courses as detailed in the supervisor agreement;
- Successful completion of all required coursework units as detailed in the supervisor agreement;
- Completion of all other required developmental activities (for example, studies in statistics, academic writing, intellectual property and electronic literacy, including use of electronic databases);
- Completion of an acceptable oral presentation on progress within the research program to the Confirmation Panel.
- Submission of a completed, or updated, supervisor agreement with all sections completed, signed off by the candidate and supervisors.
(10) Students from non-English speaking backgrounds may also receive advice at this point on any concerns regarding their demonstrated ability levels in spoken and written English.
(11) Panel Membership will consist of:
- The Head of School or nominee, or the School Higher Degree Research Coordinator (Chair);
- The Principal Supervisor;
- The Co-Supervisor(s) (if available, but the Principal Supervisor is the minimum requirement);
- A representative (who may be internal or external to the University) of the student's disciplinary area nominated by the Principal Supervisor or Head of School;
- Optionally, a person invited by the student as an aide;
- The Panel may co-opt additional expertise as required.
(12) Conduct of the Panel Meeting:
- The student must have formal notice not later than twenty working days prior to the Panel meeting. This notice shall include the day, time, location and membership of the Panel.
- Although a formal notice is provided to the student, it is assumed the date will have been negotiated well in advance (and forewarned by the Principal Supervisor). If, however, a student cannot attend the Panel meeting, the Panel may elect to offer an alternate date and/or an alternate method for attendance (such as video-conferencing). The Panel's decision on alternate arrangements is final.
- Typically, the Panel will conduct an oral examination of the student's submission for confirmation of their program to date.
- The student's aide may be present to offer any personal or moral support, but shall not have any speaking rights except at the Chair's discretion, which is final.
- A student may request the rescheduling of the Panel if for any reason the Principal Supervisor is not able to attend.
Decisions of the Panel
(13) The decisions available to the Panel are:
- Candidature is confirmed without conditions;
- Candidature is not confirmed until certain conditions are met, with a specified timeline;
- Candidate is asked to redo confirmation;
- Candidature is not confirmed and a recommendation is made by the School to the Graduate Research Subcommittee that candidature be terminated.
(14) Decisions under (12) b may not require a second meeting, However, the Chair of the Panel is responsible for consulting all Panel members regarding whether or not the student has met the conditions for confirmation.
(15) Decisions under (12) c shall require reconvening the original Panel, which must be held no later than two months after the first meeting. Only under exceptional circumstances and by agreement of the Head of School (illness of the student, or a Panel member, for example) will the Panel be allowed to defer again the decision or have original Panel members substituted:
- Decisions under Clause (12) c shall only be made when there is a reasonable prospect that the student can meet the confirmation criteria if granted extra time. Deferment when there is no realistic prospect of success is unfair to the student and any sponsor.
(16) Only when a student has met all the confirmation criteria is candidature confirmed. Students under Clauses (12) b and (12) c remain probationary students. Supervision and research work must continue as normal until the confirmation of candidature is resolved.
(17) Where the Panel cannot reach a satisfactory decision, the matter may be referred to the Head of School for determination.
(18) Students who decline (including without acceptable explanation, failing to attend an induction or the Panel meeting) to engage with the confirmation process at any time shall be deemed to have not met the confirmation criteria and will be recommended for termination of candidature under Clause (12) d.
Communicating the Outcome
(19) Whatever the decision of the Confirmation of Candidature Panel, the School will communicate the outcome to the student within ten (10) working days of the final decision being made. The student and supervisor will be provided with a copy of the Confirmation of Candidature Report, signed by all parties.
Signing the Confirmation of Candidature Report
(20) Where a student elects not to sign the Confirmation of Candidature Report, this should be noted on the report by the Chair of the Panel.
Non-Confirmation and Appeal
(21) The following will apply:
- Where the Panel has taken the decision not to confirm a student's candidature, and once the student has been notified of this outcome by the School, the completed Confirmation of Candidature Report will be forwarded to Research Services. Within five (5) working days of receipt of the School's recommendation to terminate candidature, Research Services will write to the HDR student, with a copy to the HDR Coordinator and Principal Supervisor, advising the student of their rights of appeal, which will be:
- The decision of the School can be appealed to the Graduate Research Subcommittee;
- The decision of the Graduate Research Subcommittee can be appealed to the [Undefined Division/Position]Office of the Pro Vice-Chancellor (Research), whose determination will constitute the final institutional determination of the matter;
- Any avenues of appeal to external agencies;
- Appeal the NSW Ombudsman on matters of process only.
- In writing to appellants, Research Services will include a copy of the completed Confirmation of Candidature Report, a summary of the reasons why this decision has been reached, any further option for appeal, and information about where to get advice and support.
- International students must not have their candidature terminated until all avenues of appeal are exhausted.
- All students in the process of appeal will continue to work and be supervised as normal until the outcome of the final appeal is known.
- Once the final appeal has been processed, and where the student appeal is unsuccessful, Research Services will terminate the student's candidature in the relevant student administrative systems. Research Services will notify the student, Principal Supervisor and HDR Coordinator in writing and, in the case of International students, notify the International Office.
Authority and Compliance
(22) The Procedure Administrator makes these procedures.
(23) Higher Degree by Research Students must observe these Procedures in relation to University matters.
(24) These Procedures operate as and from the Effective Date.
(25) Previous Procedures relating to Confirmation of Candidature are replaced and have no further operation from the Effective Date of this new Procedure.
Section 4 - Definitions
(26) AQF means the Australian Qualifications Framework
(27) Effective Date means takes effect on the day on which it is published or on such later day as may be specified in the procedure.
(28) Procedure Administrator is the Vice-Chancelloror delegate
(29) The Committee means the Graduate Research Subcommittee.
(30) The University means the University of New England.